Search found 516 matches
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 4:23 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
We will update documents for the tag format. Stay tuned.
- Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:00 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
You will need to put a special marker in Panel-Link tag to avoid this squished up.
- Fri Mar 22, 2024 1:10 am
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
It is not surprising you got those figures on a 5P: 1. Yes I use continuous png protocol to send my test stream. 2. For the result difference between your 5P and my 6P(29.4fps vs 7.7fps), there are two major reasons: Resolution difference(800x480vs1280x480). The larger the picture size, the longer t...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:30 am
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
I ran a javascript on my host PC today with the png picture you attached. The target is a 6P with latest firmware(715). And the result is 500 frames/65 seconds, so the calculated fps is about 7.7. Here is snippet of my test code just for your reference. async function fire(bp, interval=0, loop=false...
- Mon Mar 18, 2024 7:55 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
You can send us a png file in 1280x480 resolution. We can help you test in lab to get a fps parameter with a 6P.
- Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:48 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
1. The dimensions are different. For 5" LCD screen, it is 108mmx64.8mm. And for 6.8" LCD, it is 160.5mmx60.2mm dx.jpg 2. For the process time of panelLink protocol. The timing may vary depending on which video/picture format is chosen. The another factor may be taken into account is hardware platfor...
- Fri Mar 15, 2024 4:37 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
That is result what we were expecting. Thanks for your diligent working and dramatic contribution!
- Thu Mar 14, 2024 8:38 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
PS, you do not need to unzip the tarball at all, just point the beadatools to the tarball --"beadapanel-i6-v715-202403131.tar.gz" itself and then click 'update'.
- Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:49 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
We use build date to name the tarball for each drop, and 3131 is the latest one. Both 3112 and 3121 had a timing issue which get solved in 3131, so you can go directly to test with it. For AIDA64, we use AIDA64 EXTREME 7.00.6700. But I do not think it will be an issue for any later version. I will i...
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 9:00 pm
- Forum: BeadaPanel
- Topic: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 417
Re: Possible defective BeadaPanel 5P (or bad firmware)
A new drop of v715 firmware uploaded. You can have a regression test for the picture stream latency issue.
https://www.nxelec.com/service/download ... 131.tar.gz
MD5: E8EF5B45D9644DC4AA6D33D52C91A724
https://www.nxelec.com/service/download ... 131.tar.gz
MD5: E8EF5B45D9644DC4AA6D33D52C91A724